Social insurance and taxation under sequential majority voting and utilitarian regimes
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Sequential Majority Voting with Incomplete Profiles
In sequential majority voting, preferences are aggregated by a sequence of pairwise comparisons (also called an agenda) between candidates. The result of each comparison is determined by a weighted majority vote between the agents. In this paper we consider the situation where the agents may not have revealed all their preferences. This is common in reallife settings, due to privacy issues or a...
متن کاملWinner Determination in Sequential Majority Voting
Preferences can be aggregated using voting rules. We consider here the family of rules which perform a sequence of pairwise majority comparisons between two candidates. The winner thus depends on the chosen sequence of comparisons, which can be represented by a binary tree. We address the difficulty of computing candidates that win for some trees, and then introduce and study the notion of fair...
متن کاملMajority Rule and Utilitarian Welfare∗
We study the welfare properties of majority and supermajority rules when voting is voluntary and costly. Voters in the model have private values with differing preference intensities and voting costs. Our model is non-parametric– with only weak assumptions on the distribution of the number of eligible voters, preferences and costs. We show that, in large elections, majority rule is utilitarian ...
متن کاملOptimal Taxation and Social Insurance with Endogenous Private Insurance
What is the optimal amount of redistributive taxation and social insurance? A recent literature in public economics has come closer to providing quantitative answers to this central policy question. This literature has derived “sufficient statistic” formulas that map elasticities estimated in the modern program evaluation literature into predictions about optimal policies (e.g., Peter A. Diamon...
متن کاملOptimal Taxation and Social Insurance with Endogenous Private Insurance
This paper characterizes the welfare gains from government intervention when the private sector provides partial insurance. We analyze models in which adverse selection, preexisting information, or imperfect optimization in private insurance markets create a role for government intervention. We derive simple formulas that map existing empirical estimates into quantitative predictions for optima...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
سال: 1995
ISSN: 0165-1889
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1889(94)00840-e